Template talk:Collection: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Please explain) |
(Example.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It would be really nice if we were to tag collection members as being part of a category (of collection members!) so that scripts that work out what tasks have been implemented as parts of collections can do so systematically rather than by guessing on the basis of naming patterns. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 16:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC) |
It would be really nice if we were to tag collection members as being part of a category (of collection members!) so that scripts that work out what tasks have been implemented as parts of collections can do so systematically rather than by guessing on the basis of naming patterns. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 16:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I'm not sure what that means. Can you give an example using one of the actual collection members? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC) |
:I'm not sure what that means. Can you give an example using one of the actual collection members? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
:: Putting, e.g. [[:Category:RCBF]] in [[:Category:Collection Members]]. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 21:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:53, 3 November 2009
It would be really nice if we were to tag collection members as being part of a category (of collection members!) so that scripts that work out what tasks have been implemented as parts of collections can do so systematically rather than by guessing on the basis of naming patterns. –Donal Fellows 16:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what that means. Can you give an example using one of the actual collection members? --Mwn3d 16:16, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Putting, e.g. Category:RCBF in Category:Collection Members. --Michael Mol 21:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)