Template talk:Clarified-review: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "Perhaps this template should include support for a date when the task was clarified, or a list of the implementations that need review (though this raises other issues), or a sum...")
 
(forge attribution of author claimed by revision history; link my own talk page, to direct complaints accordingly)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Contextual Information ==

Perhaps this template should include support for a date when the task was clarified, or a list of the implementations that need review (though this raises other issues), or a summary of the nature of the changes?
Perhaps this template should include support for a date when the task was clarified, or a list of the implementations that need review (though this raises other issues), or a summary of the nature of the changes?


When I find this template on a page, I do not know when the task was clarified, nor do I really know what points were clarified, so unless I am deeply interested and willing to carefully study the page's history, the presence of this template does not carry any information for me.
When I find this template on a page, I do not know when the task was clarified, nor do I really know what points were clarified, so unless I am deeply interested and willing to carefully study the page's history, the presence of this template does not carry any information for me. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Adlai|talk]]) 11:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:00, 22 January 2021

Contextual Information

Perhaps this template should include support for a date when the task was clarified, or a list of the implementations that need review (though this raises other issues), or a summary of the nature of the changes?

When I find this template on a page, I do not know when the task was clarified, nor do I really know what points were clarified, so unless I am deeply interested and willing to carefully study the page's history, the presence of this template does not carry any information for me. --Rdm (talk) 11:06, 2 January 2021 (UTC)