Template talk:Allows: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Everything's a capability?)
m (fix signature)
Line 1: Line 1:
Since everything in "allows" should start with "Capability:", maybe one should include that in the template (i.e. instead of "<nowiki>={{1}}</nowiki>" use "<nowiki>=Capability:{{1}}</nowiki>", and then instead of "<nowiki>{{allows|Capability:Graphics}}</nowiki>" use "<nowiki>{{allows|Graphics}}</nowiki>"). --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 06:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Since everything in "allows" should start with "Capability:", maybe one should include that in the template (i.e. instead of "<nowiki>={{1}}</nowiki>" use "<nowiki>=Capability:{{1}}</nowiki>", and then instead of "<nowiki>{{allows|Capability:Graphics}}</nowiki>" use "<nowiki>{{allows|Graphics}}</nowiki>"). --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 06:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
: If everything is going to be a capability, does the "Capability" need to be explicitly stated? I left the Capability part out since I wasn't sure that everything would be a capability. --16:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
: If everything is going to be a capability, does the "Capability" need to be explicitly stated? I left the Capability part out since I wasn't sure that everything would be a capability. --[[User:Coderjoe|Coderjoe]] 16:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:26, 18 August 2010

Since everything in "allows" should start with "Capability:", maybe one should include that in the template (i.e. instead of "={{1}}" use "=Capability:{{1}}", and then instead of "{{allows|Capability:Graphics}}" use "{{allows|Graphics}}"). --Ce 06:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

If everything is going to be a capability, does the "Capability" need to be explicitly stated? I left the Capability part out since I wasn't sure that everything would be a capability. --Coderjoe 16:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)