Talk:Variable declaration reset: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(i>1 (minor point))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==i>1==
==i>1==
(minor point) I think I may have sold you all a bit of a dummy with Phix's i>1, which is correct because of it's 1-based indexes, and the JavaScript typo of i>1 which should have been/is now i>0, but should make no difference. I also wonder if algol68 shouldn't be i>LWB s ?? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 02:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
(minor point) I think I may have sold you all a bit of a dummy with Phix's i>1, which is correct because of it's 1-based indexes, and the JavaScript typo of i>1 which should have been/is now i>0, but luckily it should make no difference. I also wonder if algol68 shouldn't be i>LWB s ?? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 02:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:19, 16 April 2022

i>1

(minor point) I think I may have sold you all a bit of a dummy with Phix's i>1, which is correct because of it's 1-based indexes, and the JavaScript typo of i>1 which should have been/is now i>0, but luckily it should make no difference. I also wonder if algol68 shouldn't be i>LWB s ?? --Pete Lomax (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)