Talk:Vampire number: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "==26 numbers== Shouldn't the first 26 vampire numbers be printed? The trailing zeros condition excludes 126000 = 210 * 600, which is the first number that breaks only the thir...") |
m (→26 numbers: added a +1.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==26 numbers== |
==26 numbers== |
||
Shouldn't the first 26 vampire numbers be printed? The trailing zeros condition excludes 126000 = 210 * 600, which is the first number that breaks only the third condition.--[[User:Choroba|Choroba]] ([[User talk:Choroba|talk]]) 22:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC) |
Shouldn't the first 26 vampire numbers be printed? The trailing zeros condition excludes 126000 = 210 * 600, which is the first number that breaks only the third condition.--[[User:Choroba|Choroba]] ([[User talk:Choroba|talk]]) 22:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
: I agree, that would test one of the exclusion rules. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 22:06, 25 October 2018
26 numbers
Shouldn't the first 26 vampire numbers be printed? The trailing zeros condition excludes 126000 = 210 * 600, which is the first number that breaks only the third condition.--Choroba (talk) 22:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, that would test one of the exclusion rules. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:06, 25 October 2018 (UTC)