Talk:User defined pipe and redirection operators: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Drop reference to Co-routines.) |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
FORMAT rec fmt = $g$; |
FORMAT rec fmt = $g$; |
||
PR READ " |
PR READ "Iterator_pipe_operators.a68" PR |
||
PR READ " |
PR READ "Iterator_pipe_utilities.a68" PR |
||
FLEX[0]STRING aa; |
FLEX[0]STRING aa; |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
''' So far:''' |
''' So far:''' |
||
<pre> |
<pre> |
||
$ wc -l * |
$ wc -l *Iterator_pipe*s.a68 |
||
174 |
174 Iterator_pipe_operators.a68 |
||
58 |
58 Iterator_pipe_utilities.a68 |
||
20 |
20 test_Iterator_pipe_operators.a68 |
||
252 total |
252 total |
||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
| Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 02:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 02:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
: Coroutines and multithreading are completely separate topics. You yourself linked to coroutine implementation using Duff's device before, which decidedly is a single thread. And for your stream objects, you don't really need either of those anyway. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 02:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
: Coroutines and multithreading are completely separate topics. You yourself linked to coroutine implementation using Duff's device before, which decidedly is a single thread. And for your stream objects, you don't really need either of those anyway. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 02:48, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
||
Indeed you are right. On reflection, linking to that page on [http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html C coroutines] was a mistake. Duff's device is kind of extreme. (Interesting, but extreme!) In fact I've renamed the Algol routines to "Iterator_pipe_operators.a68". I'll drop reference to co-processing out of the ''Task Description'' too. ThanX |
|||
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 03:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC) |
|||