Revision as of 21:34, 18 May 2021 (view source) Petelomax (talk \| contribs) (→‎Clarification please) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:43, 18 May 2021 (view source) Petelomax (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 4: : Added a comment to said entry. I'll also note that 6 entries say 46 found, 10 do not. : I suspect there is a prime +4 +6 task knocking about somewhere that is effectively identical to this. ~~--[[User:Petelomax\|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax\|talk]])~~ : Ah, obviously: [[Prime_triplets]] and/or [[Cousin_primes]] are ''so'' similar to this they should '''not''' be (a triplet of three) separate tasks. --[[User:Petelomax\|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax\|talk]]) Also, "of three" is somewhat superfluous after "Triplet".

Talk:Triplet of three numbers: Difference between revisions

Talk:Triplet of three numbers (view source)