Talk:Topswops: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Speed?) |
(→Repitition?: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Should I change the limits and ask for an output table for n in 1..8 instead? The idea is not to solicit heavily speed optimised solutions but to show an accurate solution in idiomatic code. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 22:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC) |
Should I change the limits and ask for an output table for n in 1..8 instead? The idea is not to solicit heavily speed optimised solutions but to show an accurate solution in idiomatic code. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 22:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
:I would be surprised if there was not a better algorithm than the straightforward translation of the rounding process. So I think it's fine to let n from 1 to 10 in order to give an incentive to find a good algorithm.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] 23:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC) |
:I would be surprised if there was not a better algorithm than the straightforward translation of the rounding process. So I think it's fine to let n from 1 to 10 in order to give an incentive to find a good algorithm.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] 23:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Repitition? == |
|||
I assume you're not allowed to repeat configurations? Otherwise you could swap infinitely for any initial setup that didn't start with 1. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:26, 23 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:26, 23 November 2012
Speed?
Should I change the limits and ask for an output table for n in 1..8 instead? The idea is not to solicit heavily speed optimised solutions but to show an accurate solution in idiomatic code. --Paddy3118 22:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- I would be surprised if there was not a better algorithm than the straightforward translation of the rounding process. So I think it's fine to let n from 1 to 10 in order to give an incentive to find a good algorithm.--Grondilu 23:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Repitition?
I assume you're not allowed to repeat configurations? Otherwise you could swap infinitely for any initial setup that didn't start with 1. --Mwn3d 20:26, 23 November 2012 (UTC)