Talk:Smarandache prime-digital sequence: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
m (Thundergnat moved page Talk:Primes whose digits are primes to Talk:Smarandache prime-digital sequence: Thaks to Nigel Galloway for supplying the appropriate name)
m (Thanks)
 
Line 2: Line 2:


:I tried googling for a name earlier and failed to come up with anything but now we know what they're called, I'd second your suggestion. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 13:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
:I tried googling for a name earlier and failed to come up with anything but now we know what they're called, I'd second your suggestion. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 13:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

:Ah. Thank you. I suspected that these would already have a formal name but wasn't able to turn it up with a cursory search. Renamed task. (again... 🙄) --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 15:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:26, 31 May 2019

These are well known as the Smarandache prime-digital sequence. I would suggest renaming this task so.--Nigel Galloway (talk) 12:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

I tried googling for a name earlier and failed to come up with anything but now we know what they're called, I'd second your suggestion. --PureFox (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Ah. Thank you. I suspected that these would already have a formal name but wasn't able to turn it up with a cursory search. Renamed task. (again... 🙄) --Thundergnat (talk) 15:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)