Talk:Singly-linked list/Element insertion: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(It was already discussed)
Line 4: Line 4:
: '''Agree.''' Feel free to merge these tasks and [[Singly-Linked List (traversal)]] into a [[Singly-linked list]] task. In my opinion, the same could go for [[Doubly-linked list]] and [[Arrays]]. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 21:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
: '''Agree.''' Feel free to merge these tasks and [[Singly-Linked List (traversal)]] into a [[Singly-linked list]] task. In my opinion, the same could go for [[Doubly-linked list]] and [[Arrays]]. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 21:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
:We already knew about this ([[Rosetta Code:TODO]]), but no one got around to it.--[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 23:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
:We already knew about this ([[Rosetta Code:TODO]]), but no one got around to it.--[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 23:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
: The separation of the linked list tasks was my attempt to break what would have been a set of larger tasks into several smaller ones. It was unnecessary; They should be merged. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 02:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:33, 21 November 2008

Why has the task been split into two tasks?

Why has the task of using linked list been split into two tasks, Singly-Linked List (element) and Singly-Linked List (element insertion)? This makes it more difficult to follow what is going on and to test the examples. Those two can not be considered as separate independent tasks. --PauliKL 12:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Agree. Feel free to merge these tasks and Singly-Linked List (traversal) into a Singly-linked list task. In my opinion, the same could go for Doubly-linked list and Arrays. --IanOsgood 21:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
We already knew about this (Rosetta Code:TODO), but no one got around to it.--Mwn3d 23:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
The separation of the linked list tasks was my attempt to break what would have been a set of larger tasks into several smaller ones. It was unnecessary; They should be merged. --Short Circuit 02:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)