Talk:Sierpinski square curve: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (Don't have a problem with either really) |
(→My bad: Further comment.) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Um, This is probably mostly my fault as it is somewhat vague as to what a "Sierpinski square curve" exactly ''is'', and I really didn't clarify it in the task header. I would have been ok with accepting either of the "squarish" curves for this task, but also have no problem with splitting into a separate task if that is the consensus. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 17:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
::Um, This is probably mostly my fault as it is somewhat vague as to what a "Sierpinski square curve" exactly ''is'', and I really didn't clarify it in the task header. I would have been ok with accepting either of the "squarish" curves for this task, but also have no problem with splitting into a separate task if that is the consensus. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 17:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::Yeah, I agree that having a separate task for 'Sierpiński curve' seems best in the circumstances. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:02, 5 March 2020
My bad
Seems I rushed in and implemented the Sierpinski curve from the wikipedia page (on the left) not the Sierpinski square curve on the right, then a couple of others followed suit. Therefore I created Sierpinski_curve and moved the Phix/Go/Julia entries there. --Pete Lomax (talk) 16:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- To be fair, I think the Wikipedia article is extremely confusing on what is and what isn't a 'Sierpiński square curve'. I think what we had before is sometimes called a 'Sierpiński square snowflake' so it was an understandable mistake. --PureFox (talk) 17:20, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Um, This is probably mostly my fault as it is somewhat vague as to what a "Sierpinski square curve" exactly is, and I really didn't clarify it in the task header. I would have been ok with accepting either of the "squarish" curves for this task, but also have no problem with splitting into a separate task if that is the consensus. --Thundergnat (talk) 17:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)