Talk:Short-circuit evaluation: Difference between revisions
m
→Compiler optimisations?
Line 32:
: Text moved as unclea if it describes fully compliant compiler - If language states short-circuit then compiler should be compliant. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
:: Perhaps apropos is this quote from Charles Moore's 1970 book "PROGRAMMING A PROBLEM-ORIENTED-LANGUAGE" [http://www.colorforth.com/POL.htm Moreover this attitude is reinforced by the massive trend to high-level languages and a placid acceptance of their inefficiencies: What's the use of designing a really good algorithm if the compiler's going to botch it up anyway?] --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 16:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
| |||