Talk:Sanitize user input: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(removal of "task" note)
(Commented)
Line 2: Line 2:
:Not too fussed. I think it is mildly interesting that sometimes you have to sanitize your own source code in much the same way as user input, but otherwise I agree this is "not a task". Delete or "orphan" by removing the <nowiki>{{draft task}}</nowiki> tag would both be fine by me. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 14:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
:Not too fussed. I think it is mildly interesting that sometimes you have to sanitize your own source code in much the same way as user input, but otherwise I agree this is "not a task". Delete or "orphan" by removing the <nowiki>{{draft task}}</nowiki> tag would both be fine by me. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 14:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
:OK, I've gone ahead and removed "task", we'll see what portals to hell open up for me. As I said I'm fine with this being on rc, as a mildly interesting diversion/discussion, but it does not qualify as a task. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 10:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
:OK, I've gone ahead and removed "task", we'll see what portals to hell open up for me. As I said I'm fine with this being on rc, as a mildly interesting diversion/discussion, but it does not qualify as a task. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 10:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
:: If Thundergnat is agreeable, might as well just delete it as there's not much point is leaving orphaned stuff around. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 13:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:32, 11 September 2021

Delete? Is this task meant to be serious or someone's idea of a mickey-take? The link to Bobby tables takes me to a wiki explaining comics. Clearly this rc contributor's input is not to be trusted--Nigel Galloway (talk) 13:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Not too fussed. I think it is mildly interesting that sometimes you have to sanitize your own source code in much the same way as user input, but otherwise I agree this is "not a task". Delete or "orphan" by removing the {{draft task}} tag would both be fine by me. --Pete Lomax (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
OK, I've gone ahead and removed "task", we'll see what portals to hell open up for me. As I said I'm fine with this being on rc, as a mildly interesting diversion/discussion, but it does not qualify as a task. --Pete Lomax (talk) 10:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
If Thundergnat is agreeable, might as well just delete it as there's not much point is leaving orphaned stuff around. --PureFox (talk) 13:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)