Anonymous user
Talk:Rosetta Code/Rank languages by popularity: Difference between revisions
Talk:Rosetta Code/Rank languages by popularity (view source)
Revision as of 11:10, 20 December 2013
, 10 years ago→wanted: a complete list: changed "nobody" to "nothing". -- ~~~~
m (→wanted: a complete list: updated the number of languages. -- ~~~~) |
m (→wanted: a complete list: changed "nobody" to "nothing". -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 236:
<br>Now, there're '''500''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 07:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
<br>Now, there're '''501''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 09:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
</strike>▼
<br>Now, there're '''502''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
▲</strike>
<br>Now, there're '''503''' programming languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:10, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
<br><br>The decrease in the number of programming languages is due to combining the
:::* '''UC++'''
Line 262 ⟶ 263:
:::* 2 (tied) gnu
:::* 6 ape
with all 2<sup>nd</sup> place names marked as ''tied'' for 2<sup>nd</sup>, and
<br>These duplicates (tied for placement) would make a good addition to this task (to rank languages ''correctly'') -- or lacking that, a good Rosetta Code task that can stand by itself.
<br>Note that the chicken was disqualified as it wouldn't cross the road. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 20:48, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
| |||