Talk:Rosetta Code/Find bare lang tags: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(I have restored your AutoHotkey code, with a different wiki syntax...)
(→‎Fix it please!: There is a way forward…)
Line 8: Line 8:
:I managed it myself, but can't put the AutoHotkey back... --[[User:Crazyfirex|Crazyfirex]] 23:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
:I managed it myself, but can't put the AutoHotkey back... --[[User:Crazyfirex|Crazyfirex]] 23:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
::I have restored your AutoHotkey code, with a different wiki syntax: I used <pre><nowiki>...</nowiki></pre>, not <lang AutoHotkey>...</lang>, but there is no syntax highlighting. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 02:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
::I have restored your AutoHotkey code, with a different wiki syntax: I used <pre><nowiki>...</nowiki></pre>, not <lang AutoHotkey>...</lang>, but there is no syntax highlighting. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 02:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
::: The easiest way out is to go for the full extra credit so that you pull the data from RC rather than supplying it. :-) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:28, 23 September 2011

Draft status

This should remain a draft task until such time as there are a number of implementations (4, perhaps?) of which at least one should do the extra credit item. (Once that's been reached, just remove the “draft” word from the leading template declaration. Hope the task graduates soon!) –Donal Fellows 21:36, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Fix it please!

Can someone please roll back my edit? I was attempting to put the task data within the script, and that backfired royally. here's a raw paste of the AutoHotkey task... http://www.autohotkey.net/paste/text/jz9mfh --Crazyfirex 23:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

I managed it myself, but can't put the AutoHotkey back... --Crazyfirex 23:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I have restored your AutoHotkey code, with a different wiki syntax: I used <pre><nowiki>...</nowiki></pre>, not <lang AutoHotkey>...</lang>, but there is no syntax highlighting. --Kernigh 02:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The easiest way out is to go for the full extra credit so that you pull the data from RC rather than supplying it. :-) –Donal Fellows 09:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)