Talk:Rice coding: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Wat?)
 
mNo edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
It's difficult to tell whether the current implementation here is correct.
It's difficult to tell whether the current implementation here is correct.


Ricde coding is apparently a compression technique, but inspecting the <code>encode</code> implementation, I see <code>($n mod $d).polymod(2 xx $k - 1).reverse<code> which probably means that the encoded number would have at least as many bits as the value of the number being encoded. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 12:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Ricde coding is apparently a compression technique, but inspecting the <code>encode</code> implementation, I see <code>($n mod $d).polymod(2 xx $k - 1).reverse</code> which probably means that the encoded number would have at least as many bits as the value of the number being encoded. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 12:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:03, 21 September 2023

No examples?

It's difficult to tell whether the current implementation here is correct.

Ricde coding is apparently a compression technique, but inspecting the encode implementation, I see ($n mod $d).polymod(2 xx $k - 1).reverse which probably means that the encoded number would have at least as many bits as the value of the number being encoded. --Rdm (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)