Talk:Reverse a string: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Extra Credit unicode reversing solutions?) |
(Why go for extra credit? It's too much like work...) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Extra Credit?== |
==Extra Credit?== |
||
Does any example go for the extra credit Unicode combining characters? It seems to have been introduced [[http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Reversing_a_string&oldid=22893 here]] by Kevin Reid, but I am not sure that even his [[http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Reversing_a_string&oldid=36231#E E example]] goes for the extra credit. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 04:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC) |
Does any example go for the extra credit Unicode combining characters? It seems to have been introduced [[http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Reversing_a_string&oldid=22893 here]] by Kevin Reid, but I am not sure that even his [[http://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=Reversing_a_string&oldid=36231#E E example]] goes for the extra credit. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 04:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Nobody's tackled it since the requirement was introduced. It's moderately tricky too IIRC, as it gets into the whole problem of normalization of strings. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:07, 28 July 2009
Extra Credit?
Does any example go for the extra credit Unicode combining characters? It seems to have been introduced [here] by Kevin Reid, but I am not sure that even his [E example] goes for the extra credit. --Paddy3118 04:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Nobody's tackled it since the requirement was introduced. It's moderately tricky too IIRC, as it gets into the whole problem of normalization of strings. —Donal Fellows 08:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)