Talk:Ray-casting algorithm: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→AutoHotkey version: new section) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Ah, It seems there are one set of points for all polygons. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 01:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
:Ah, It seems there are one set of points for all polygons. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 01:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
:: Yes, I preferred to use a single set, and to index it (it's not an odd technics if a subset of points is shared among several polygons we want to define). --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 16:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
:: Yes, I preferred to use a single set, and to index it (it's not an odd technics if a subset of points is shared among several polygons we want to define). --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 16:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
== AutoHotkey version == |
|||
The AutoHotkey solution refers to ray_intersects_segment without defining it, but it seems to me that defining ray_intersects_segment is a key part of this task. --[[User:Mr2001|Mr2001]] 07:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:31, 31 October 2010
Fortran: The point of pts?
What is pts used for in the Fortran example? --Paddy3118 01:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, It seems there are one set of points for all polygons. --Paddy3118 01:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I preferred to use a single set, and to index it (it's not an odd technics if a subset of points is shared among several polygons we want to define). --ShinTakezou 16:53, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
AutoHotkey version
The AutoHotkey solution refers to ray_intersects_segment without defining it, but it seems to me that defining ray_intersects_segment is a key part of this task. --Mr2001 07:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)