Talk:Probabilistic choice: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Thx, Dan.) |
(→J solution: another way of counting) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Thanks, Dan. As I'm sure you recognized, the local definitions are simply for improving readability. In particular, the one for partitions (prtn) exists only to document and emphasize the partition-set that is the left argument to Interval Index. Omitting that name would still keep things simple and readable: da=. (+/\pt) I. ?y # 0 |
:Thanks, Dan. As I'm sure you recognized, the local definitions are simply for improving readability. In particular, the one for partitions (prtn) exists only to document and emphasize the partition-set that is the left argument to Interval Index. Omitting that name would still keep things simple and readable: da=. (+/\pt) I. ?y # 0 |
||
:--[[User:TBH|TBH]] 18:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
:--[[User:TBH|TBH]] 18:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
TBH I don't know if it's worth it, but another possib. for counting is: pa =. \:~ y%~ #/.~ da |
|||
:--[[User:Gaaijz|Gaaijz]] 18:41, 26 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:41, 26 December 2008
J solution
Well done, TBH.
--DanBron 22:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dan. As I'm sure you recognized, the local definitions are simply for improving readability. In particular, the one for partitions (prtn) exists only to document and emphasize the partition-set that is the left argument to Interval Index. Omitting that name would still keep things simple and readable: da=. (+/\pt) I. ?y # 0
- --TBH 18:55, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
TBH I don't know if it's worth it, but another possib. for counting is: pa =. \:~ y%~ #/.~ da
- --Gaaijz 18:41, 26 December 2008 (UTC)