Talk:Primality by Wilson's theorem: Difference between revisions

(Created discussion page - querying 1,000th prime.)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
===1,000th prime?===
I think the Perl 6 and Factor examples may be wrong here as, according to [https://www.di-mgt.com.au/primes1000.html an independent source], the 1,000th prime is 7,919 rather than 7,927.--[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 15:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
: Thanks. Looks like it was an off-by-one error. --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 15:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 
== Promote to Task ==
 
The task is clearly defined, and several implementations exist. Should be prompted to a task.
 
--[[User:DavidFashion|DavidFashion]] ([[User talk:DavidFashion|talk]]) 22:23, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
: Perhaps the title should be changed to "Primal<u>'''i'''</u>ty by Wilson's theorem first? --[[User:Chunes|Chunes]] ([[User talk:Chunes|talk]]) 00:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 
== Similar less practical tests ==
 
I'd love to see some of the others:
* Jolivad's Test
* Vantieghem's Test
* Montferrier
* Zsigmondy
* Laurent's Test
* Vecchi
* Latin triangles
--[[User:Billymacc|Billymacc]] ([[User talk:Billymacc|talk]]) 19:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
23

edits