Talk:Parametric polymorphism: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(ALGOL 68) |
(→ALGOL 68: Editor was not confident.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In the "omit from" of ALGOL 68, it is stated: "it isn't immediately obvious that ALGOL 68 is object oriented". While this may be true, it is irrelevant in this context, because parametric polymorphism is completely unrelated to object-orientation. The task might nevertheless be inappropriate for ALGOL 68, but certainly not for the given reason. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 20:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC) |
In the "omit from" of ALGOL 68, it is stated: "it isn't immediately obvious that ALGOL 68 is object oriented". While this may be true, it is irrelevant in this context, because parametric polymorphism is completely unrelated to object-orientation. The task might nevertheless be inappropriate for ALGOL 68, but certainly not for the given reason. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 20:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC) |
||
: I have concerns that the editor wasn't confident enough in their analysis to make a definitive statement as to whether or not the language has support. (Though the Unimpl pages include the ommitted tasks in anticipation of that kind of error.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 23:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:25, 10 December 2009
ALGOL 68
In the "omit from" of ALGOL 68, it is stated: "it isn't immediately obvious that ALGOL 68 is object oriented". While this may be true, it is irrelevant in this context, because parametric polymorphism is completely unrelated to object-orientation. The task might nevertheless be inappropriate for ALGOL 68, but certainly not for the given reason. --Ce 20:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have concerns that the editor wasn't confident enough in their analysis to make a definitive statement as to whether or not the language has support. (Though the Unimpl pages include the ommitted tasks in anticipation of that kind of error.) --Michael Mol 23:25, 10 December 2009 (UTC)