Talk:Orbital elements: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added a section title for the 1st talk topic, added a new talk section.) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
fact = math.sqrt(2.0 / r - 1.0 / semimajorAxis) |
fact = math.sqrt(2.0 / r - 1.0 / semimajorAxis) |
||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
? this could |
? this could show where we diverge --Walter Pachl 20:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC) |
||
== REXX (version 2) results match Perl 6's == |
== REXX (version 2) results match Perl 6's == |
Revision as of 07:58, 30 October 2018
seemingly incorrect results ?
Python results seem to be incorrect ?? --Walter Pachl 17:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- The task needs concrete examples to make this sort of issue clear. --Rdm (talk) 17:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Pls look at the one and only input used by all other samples. I found this when I had to see that my results were wrong --Walter Pachl 17:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Well, most (all) others prodce identical results. --Walter Pachl 18:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Could you pls show 'your' values of
c = math.cos(trueAnomaly) s = math.sin(trueAnomaly) fact = math.sqrt(2.0 / r - 1.0 / semimajorAxis)
? this could show where we diverge --Walter Pachl 20:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
REXX (version 2) results match Perl 6's
I took the orbital elements from the Perl 6 example/entry and added them to the REXX (version 2) example/entry and the results agree, so we now have multiple concurrences of two different data examples. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)