Talk:Mono: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(not C#) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mono isn't just a [[C sharp|C#]] implementation, it's also a [[.Net Framework]] implementation, and a few other things. ([[wp:Mono (software)|The Wikipedia page]] has quite a bit of info.) Not too sure what to do about that, except maybe give it a brief write-up and link to .Net & C#... or something. Does anyone have a better idea? -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 15:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
Mono isn't just a [[C sharp|C#]] implementation, it's also a [[.Net Framework]] implementation, and a few other things. ([[wp:Mono (software)|The Wikipedia page]] has quite a bit of info.) Not too sure what to do about that, except maybe give it a brief write-up and link to .Net & C#... or something. Does anyone have a better idea? -- [[User:Eriksiers|Eriksiers]] 15:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Apparently (from what I've been told) it doesn't have nearly enough of the libraries to run many C# apps that are out there in the wild, so while it is a C# implementation, it's not a full .Net impl. I have not had the time to independently confirm or deny this though. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 16:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 16:42, 28 October 2009
Mono isn't just a C# implementation, it's also a .Net Framework implementation, and a few other things. (The Wikipedia page has quite a bit of info.) Not too sure what to do about that, except maybe give it a brief write-up and link to .Net & C#... or something. Does anyone have a better idea? -- Eriksiers 15:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Apparently (from what I've been told) it doesn't have nearly enough of the libraries to run many C# apps that are out there in the wild, so while it is a C# implementation, it's not a full .Net impl. I have not had the time to independently confirm or deny this though. —Donal Fellows 16:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)