Talk:Metronome: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Thoughts)
 
(Millisecond-accuracy timings should do)
Line 3: Line 3:
* Reword "However, the playing of the sounds should not interfere with the timing of the metronome, so a separation of the playing and timing processes may be required." Just say something simpler such as "the beat indicator should remain true to the selected tempo." Anything more there is either vague, overspecification or unnecessary, IMO.
* Reword "However, the playing of the sounds should not interfere with the timing of the metronome, so a separation of the playing and timing processes may be required." Just say something simpler such as "the beat indicator should remain true to the selected tempo." Anything more there is either vague, overspecification or unnecessary, IMO.
--[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
--[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
: Given that metronomes are aimed at helping people when playing music, the timings really don't need to be perfect. A millisecond timer should do fine provided it is coupled properly to an absolute time source so the workload of sound and <s>fury</s> GUI doesn't interfere. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:11, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:11, 11 September 2011

Thoughts:

  • Allow audio-only, visual-only and/or both; some languages can't provide audio outputs, but the principle components of a metronome can still be represented.
  • Reword "However, the playing of the sounds should not interfere with the timing of the metronome, so a separation of the playing and timing processes may be required." Just say something simpler such as "the beat indicator should remain true to the selected tempo." Anything more there is either vague, overspecification or unnecessary, IMO.

--Michael Mol 14:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Given that metronomes are aimed at helping people when playing music, the timings really don't need to be perfect. A millisecond timer should do fine provided it is coupled properly to an absolute time source so the workload of sound and fury GUI doesn't interfere. –Donal Fellows 08:11, 11 September 2011 (UTC)