Talk:Largest int from concatenated ints: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎Duplicates?: Duplicates are not excluded)
Line 8: Line 8:


Paddy3118, please clarify whether the list may or may not include duplicates. --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 11:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC) PS where have the edit buttons gone?
Paddy3118, please clarify whether the list may or may not include duplicates. --[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 11:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC) PS where have the edit buttons gone?
:Hi Nigel. Duplicates are not excluded. P.S. I assumed that the edit buttons were a (short term) casualty of the MW upgrade. [[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:09, 4 April 2013

Negative integers

These programs look like they can't handle negative integers. I don't know how to concatenate two integers if the second one is negative; "4" "-5" => "4-5" is not an integer. Perhaps the task should specify positive integers? Or non-negative integers, if "0" is allowed? --Kernigh (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Yep. I'm sloppy. I will fix this.Paddy3118 (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Duplicates?

Paddy3118, please clarify whether the list may or may not include duplicates. --Nigel Galloway (talk) 11:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC) PS where have the edit buttons gone?

Hi Nigel. Duplicates are not excluded. P.S. I assumed that the edit buttons were a (short term) casualty of the MW upgrade. Paddy3118 (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)