Talk:Jump anywhere: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Draft task: Various points) |
(→Draft task: Continuations could be another task) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Tcl (8.6) has pretty much the same capabilities as Python in this area. (When people ask for general jump anywhere capabilities, we tend to be somewhat brusque in our dismissals; it's totally against nice structured programming as well as being evil.) I'll keep an eye on the evolution of the page to see whether I want to omit or implement. Generally, should continuations be a solution of this task? Or is it more about setjmp/longjmp? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 17:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
:: Tcl (8.6) has pretty much the same capabilities as Python in this area. (When people ask for general jump anywhere capabilities, we tend to be somewhat brusque in our dismissals; it's totally against nice structured programming as well as being evil.) I'll keep an eye on the evolution of the page to see whether I want to omit or implement. Generally, should continuations be a solution of this task? Or is it more about setjmp/longjmp? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 17:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
||
::: Just to be clear, this is not to diss having a task on continuations. It's just they're not simple jumps; if we split, we can easily justify another task specifically for them. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 19:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Demonstrate a local jump and a global jump == |
== Demonstrate a local jump and a global jump == |
Revision as of 19:09, 19 May 2011
Draft task
My new task description might not match my intent. I have a short Ruby example, but I want to add more Ruby code, and some C code. --Kernigh 02:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I'll monitor and ask about changes needed for the Python as things develop :-)
--Paddy3118 02:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Tcl (8.6) has pretty much the same capabilities as Python in this area. (When people ask for general jump anywhere capabilities, we tend to be somewhat brusque in our dismissals; it's totally against nice structured programming as well as being evil.) I'll keep an eye on the evolution of the page to see whether I want to omit or implement. Generally, should continuations be a solution of this task? Or is it more about setjmp/longjmp? –Donal Fellows 17:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, this is not to diss having a task on continuations. It's just they're not simple jumps; if we split, we can easily justify another task specifically for them. –Donal Fellows 19:09, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Tcl (8.6) has pretty much the same capabilities as Python in this area. (When people ask for general jump anywhere capabilities, we tend to be somewhat brusque in our dismissals; it's totally against nice structured programming as well as being evil.) I'll keep an eye on the evolution of the page to see whether I want to omit or implement. Generally, should continuations be a solution of this task? Or is it more about setjmp/longjmp? –Donal Fellows 17:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Demonstrate a local jump and a global jump
It might be better for the task to be demonstrate a local jump and a global jump. (Currently the requirement appears to be for a global jump, requiring a new task to be created for a local jump).
Markhobley 14:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)