Talk:Juggler sequence: Difference between revisions
m (forced a TOC (for now)) |
(→talk about a very delayed déjà vu: Responded to Gerard.) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== talk about a very delayed ''déjà vu'' == |
== talk about a very delayed ''déjà vu'' == |
||
It wasn't after I backed up (archived) my '''juggler''' REXX program for this (draft) task (to my archive/backup hard drive) that I discovered a copy of my (draft) task for the this sequence (I had put it aside for some reason, and then forgot about it). The old draft was created in March, 2016. Oh well. Not the first time, and it won't be the last, either. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC) |
It wasn't after I backed up (archived) my '''juggler''' REXX program for this (draft) task (to my archive/backup hard drive) that I discovered a copy of my (draft) task for the this sequence (I had put it aside for some reason, and then forgot about it). The old draft was created in March, 2016. Oh well. Not the first time, and it won't be the last, either. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
:I was surprised that someone hadn't made a task out of this before because it's quite a well known number sequence with an interesting background. Is there anything in your original draft that might be worth adding now? --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 16:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:10, 19 August 2021
Bigger values of 'n' to try
Looks like this task is too easy on modern hardware for those with access to GMP.
I've found a more up to date link with some even bigger numbers for those who want to extend their solution.
The value of h[n] for the biggest of these (n = 1,247,677,915) has more than 3.2 billion digits!
Regrettably, Harry Smith who did much early work on the subject has now passed away. --PureFox (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
talk about a very delayed déjà vu
It wasn't after I backed up (archived) my juggler REXX program for this (draft) task (to my archive/backup hard drive) that I discovered a copy of my (draft) task for the this sequence (I had put it aside for some reason, and then forgot about it). The old draft was created in March, 2016. Oh well. Not the first time, and it won't be the last, either. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)