Talk:Juggler sequence: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added some comments.) |
(→talk about a very delayed déjà vu: Further comment.) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:: My original draft (from 2016) didn't have as many "big integers" for stress testing, but it did have a much prettier (HTML <big> <nowiki> <math></nowiki></big>) formulas: '''floor''' and '''square root''' symbols, for two. I had copies the use of the '''floor''' from a Wikipedia site, but Rosetta Code didn't render it properly (lots of big red error messages). It took me a while to get those symbols to display properly without crashing something in Rosetta Code. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC) |
:: My original draft (from 2016) didn't have as many "big integers" for stress testing, but it did have a much prettier (HTML <big> <nowiki> <math></nowiki></big>) formulas: '''floor''' and '''square root''' symbols, for two. I had copies the use of the '''floor''' from a Wikipedia site, but Rosetta Code didn't render it properly (lots of big red error messages). It took me a while to get those symbols to display properly without crashing something in Rosetta Code. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
::: I did wonder about making the formulas a bit prettier but I'm always reluctant to use fancy formatting in case it doesn't render properly on all the different browsers people use. Also I've never been keen on the 'floor', 'ceil' and 'integer part' symbols which you need to examine quite closely to make sure that they're not just a value in square brackets. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||