Talk:Integer sequence: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Criteria for non-draft?) |
(→Criteria for non-draft?: Added some detail.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What are the criteria for this being a non-draft task? My usual rule-of-thumbs are all satisfied (multiple correct implementations by multiple people, so it appears to be entirely understandable and practical). –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 00:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
What are the criteria for this being a non-draft task? My usual rule-of-thumbs are all satisfied (multiple correct implementations by multiple people, so it appears to be entirely understandable and practical). –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 00:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
: I've been satisfied with it for a while, just waiting for people to bring up any issues they had. Converted to non-draft. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 01:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
: I just added a recommendation for showing both native and arbitrarily-large numbers where appropriate, and soliciting discussion of the state of such in the language. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 01:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:35, 17 February 2011
Criteria for non-draft?
What are the criteria for this being a non-draft task? My usual rule-of-thumbs are all satisfied (multiple correct implementations by multiple people, so it appears to be entirely understandable and practical). –Donal Fellows 00:45, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- I've been satisfied with it for a while, just waiting for people to bring up any issues they had. Converted to non-draft. --Michael Mol 01:27, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- I just added a recommendation for showing both native and arbitrarily-large numbers where appropriate, and soliciting discussion of the state of such in the language. --Michael Mol 01:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)