Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions

(→‎ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): I understood what you did bit don' agree.)
Line 97:
 
-----
 
== entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section ==
 
I see an ooRexx language entry was again incorrectly added to the (Classic) REXX language section.   ooRexx has it's own language section; nowhere else is there cross-posting of entries of one language (with it's own language section) into a different language section (there may be exceptions on talk pages, but I don't know that).   If more explanation is needed, the above (preceding) talk section can be reviewed.   Perhaps it would be equitable if modified (for those differences that ooRexx can't handle) Classic REXX entries were also entered under the ooRexx section?   Of course not.   The venue for ooRexx examples is in the ooRexx language section.   Entering an ooRexx entry in the Classic REXX section to show the differences from ooRexx isn't way to do that. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 
I don't see any benefit of these editing skirmishes. &nbsp; It's become a colossal waste of time in trying to explain that ooRexx entries belong in the ooRexx language section, irrespective of what ooRexx can or can't support. &nbsp; If it is believed that cross-posting of one language into another language section is acceptable and permissible, I won't move it the 3<sup>rd</sup> time. &nbsp; My time is more valuable then trying to keep ooRexx progams in the ooRexx language section. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC)