Talk:Hickerson series of almost integers: Difference between revisions
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) m (→Clojure?: minor change with desastrous consequences) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) m (→Clojure?) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Clojure?== |
==Clojure?== |
||
Perhaps the Clojure entry was deleted by mistake. Too many edits in a short time? -[[User:Bearophile|bearophile]] ([[User talk:Bearophile|talk]]) 19:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC) |
Perhaps the Clojure entry was deleted by mistake. Too many edits in a short time? -[[User:Bearophile|bearophile]] ([[User talk:Bearophile|talk]]) 19:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
: Apparently so: I changed <pre> to </pre> at the bottom :-( --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 20:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC) |
: Apparently so: I changed < pre > to < /pre > at the bottom :-( --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 20:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:01, 4 January 2014
OEIS
I stuck the first five nearest integers from the series into The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences whereupon I discovered it as series A034172 and the search for terms mentions more series. --Paddy3118 (talk) 11:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
range 1 to 17
Why does the reference article claim 1 to 17 when it also has 'almost integers' only up to 15? --Walterpachl (talk) 11:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Why indeed? I just put it down to a hasty compilation of the page. It did point out to me that there was a task to be done though :-)
- --Paddy3118 (talk) 16:35, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Perl 6 comment
Hi Timtoady, I put the comment # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 17
outside the <pre>...</pre> block (but still in the output section) just to emphasise that it was not output printed by the program but something added in after. Or so I thought after scanning the Perl 6 source for that line as code. --Paddy3118 (talk) 17:18, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Clojure?
Perhaps the Clojure entry was deleted by mistake. Too many edits in a short time? -bearophile (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Apparently so: I changed < pre > to < /pre > at the bottom :-( --Walterpachl (talk) 20:00, 4 January 2014 (UTC)