Talk:Greatest common divisor: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→PL/I: new section) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→errors in programs: add gcd(0,0) case) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
A few programs would attempt to divide by zero if the 2nd argument is 0 (zero). |
A few programs would attempt to divide by zero if the 2nd argument is 0 (zero). |
||
<br> In that special case, the absolute value of the first argument should be returned. |
<br> In that special case, the absolute value of the first argument should be returned. |
||
::unless it is 0 --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 12:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
<br><br>A number of examples don't show the results if either argument is negative. |
<br><br>A number of examples don't show the results if either argument is negative. |
||
Revision as of 12:40, 17 August 2012
errors in programs
A few programs would attempt to divide by zero if the 2nd argument is 0 (zero).
In that special case, the absolute value of the first argument should be returned.
- unless it is 0 --Walterpachl 12:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
A number of examples don't show the results if either argument is negative.
REXX Version 1
These results seem to be wrong:
- the GCD of 14 and 0 and 7 is 14 should be 7
- the GCD of 0 and 7 is 0 should be 7
- the GCD of 0 and 0 is 0 should be ???
correct:
- the GCD of 7 and 0 is 7
--Walterpachl 12:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
PL/I
should return a positive integer
- and take care of gcd/0,0)
--Walterpachl 12:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)