Talk:Gradient descent: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Needs more info)
 
(→‎Needs more information: added a new talk section about the reverting of draft back to full task status.)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Needs more information ==
== Needs more information ==
This needs a description, purpose and preferably, a given function to solve for so that different implementations can be compared. Changed to draft status until that is supplied. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 12:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
This needs a description, purpose and preferably, a given function to solve for so that different implementations can be compared. Changed to draft status until that is supplied. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 12:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

== promoted from draft? ==
I thought it was normal for a task to be a draft task until at least four (or so) examples have been entered, and also wait
a week or so before promoting it.   I know there are no hard and fast rules.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 19:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:21, 1 July 2019

Needs more information

This needs a description, purpose and preferably, a given function to solve for so that different implementations can be compared. Changed to draft status until that is supplied. --Thundergnat (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

I thought it was normal for a task to be a draft task until at least four (or so) examples have been entered, and also wait a week or so before promoting it.   I know there are no hard and fast rules.     -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 19:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)