Talk:Functional coverage tree: Difference between revisions
→Tightening up the description of the main calculation ?
(→Data in a more functional form: add_node use.) |
|||
Line 80:
86.0
>>> </lang>
==Tightening up the description of the coverage calculation ?==
The given formulation of the coverage values of nodes sounds like a statement about '''all''' nodes in the tree, but is in fact, of course, valid only for a '''minority''' of them.
(It's valid for those which have children – but the majority are leaf nodes, with coverage values which are direct and supplied rather than computed. If we took the task description literally, the coverage value of all leaf nodes, and hence of all parent nodes too, would be zero).
Perhaps worth tightening up that sentence, or adding one to cover the majority case, in which the number of children is zero ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 18:49, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
| |||