Talk:First power of 2 that has leading decimal digits of 12: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎License check: title info.)
Line 16: Line 16:


::::: Yeah, makes sense I guess. I'd been looking for a deeper meaning but couldn't think of any. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 00:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
::::: Yeah, makes sense I guess. I'd been looking for a deeper meaning but couldn't think of any. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 00:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

== is there an easy way to get those delta 2^i (delta = i-Last_i ) ? ==

searching for '123' there is a double 485
Delta <BR>
<pre> 90 289 196 289 196 485 196 289 196 289 196 289 196 485 196 289 196 289 196 289 196 485 196 289 196 289 196 289 196 485 485 196 </pre>
searching for '317' ( not the smallest at start, 1651 seldom )
<pre> 779 485 485 1651 485 485 1166 485 485 1166 485 485 1166 485 485 1166 485 485 1166 485 485 1166 485 485 1651 </pre>
--[[User Horst.h|Horst.h]]12:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)~

Revision as of 12:14, 20 January 2020

License check

We seem to be following the license from the original site, (although I couldn't find the problem number to add a link).
- Note: I am not the uthor of thie task, just checking the license. --Paddy3118 (talk) 22:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

I've found the problem number which is 686. --PureFox (talk) 23:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
I was just about to add the (home page) information.   I had originally phrased the problem much differently, but then it seemed to be more confusing and somewhat unclear, so I went with the original wording and phrasing that someone had paraphrased.   I tried to find the problem on that website, but I couldn't find   (I must have mis-remembered some keyword/keywords because I couldn't locate it via my search engine, other than it was on that site.     -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 23:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Your RC title gives more info 👍 --Paddy3118 (talk) 12:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

significance of a given   p   value

I wonder what the significance is of saying that: "You are also given that p(123,45)=12710."? It's not as if it's going to take a long time to calculate whatever method is used. --PureFox (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
The reasoning behind that (I believe) was to give the programmer an answer so that it could be used for verification of their programming solution to check if their calculation was working correctly for a "modest" (or easy) expression/formula.     -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Yeah, makes sense I guess. I'd been looking for a deeper meaning but couldn't think of any. --PureFox (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

is there an easy way to get those delta 2^i (delta = i-Last_i ) ?

searching for '123' there is a double 485 Delta

   90  289  196  289  196  485  196  289  196  289  196  289  196  485  196  289  196  289  196  289  196  485  196  289  196  289  196  289  196  485  485  196 

searching for '317' ( not the smallest at start, 1651 seldom )

  779  485  485 1651  485  485 1166  485  485 1166  485  485 1166  485  485 1166  485  485 1166  485  485 1166  485  485 1651 

--Horst.h12:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)~