Talk:Executable library: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 08:41, 19 April 2011

History

This task came from discussions Here. I was nervous about just deleting all the code for that task so decided to create this, mark the other for maybe future deletion, and see how things go. --Paddy3118 23:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Tcl problem

Oh no, after all the confusion of Scripted main the Tcl example shows a design pattern that is central to the method, but doesn't follow the task description in a way that I had thought a secondary feature of the task - the two separate files. I won't make any changes just yet, (maybe the Tcl author would like to comment)? But I am aware that although I like what this sets out to do, the explanation might need further clarification. --Paddy3118 06:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

I must've been distracted when I wrote it. Corrected. –Donal Fellows 11:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Donal. --Paddy3118 12:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

executable Shared Objects?

Is there a way to build Shared Objects to make them valid executables? --Oenone 08:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:41, 19 April 2011 (view source) Oenone (talk \| contribs) (→‎executable Shared Objects?: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:41, 19 April 2011 (view source) Oenone (talk \| contribs) m (→‎executable Shared Objects?: add sig) Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== executable Shared Objects? ==		== executable Shared Objects? ==

	Is there a way to build Shared Objects to make them valid executables?		Is there a way to build Shared Objects to make them valid executables? --[[User:Oenone\|Oenone]] 08:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)