Talk:Elementary cellular automaton/Random number generator: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
Line 2: Line 2:


The description urges "little endian" (byte order in longer integer types), but was really talking about arranging bits in a byte. Misnomer? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] ([[User talk:Ledrug|talk]]) 18:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
The description urges "little endian" (byte order in longer integer types), but was really talking about arranging bits in a byte. Misnomer? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] ([[User talk:Ledrug|talk]]) 18:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

:It seems so. My bad. Is "with the least significant bit" at the end correct?--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 09:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


==Probably needs more restrictions==
==Probably needs more restrictions==

Revision as of 09:55, 21 March 2014

Endianness or MSB/LSB difference?

The description urges "little endian" (byte order in longer integer types), but was really talking about arranging bits in a byte. Misnomer? --Ledrug (talk) 18:54, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

It seems so. My bad. Is "with the least significant bit" at the end correct?--Grondilu (talk) 09:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Probably needs more restrictions

Rule 30 with fixed '0' ends just goes to '1' in all cells after a while. --Paddy3118 (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)