Talk:Dominoes: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
Line 1: Line 1:
==ignoring value symmetry==
==ignoring value symmetry==
Can you explain what "and finally considering values but ignoring value symmetry, i.e. transposing 5 and 4" means? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)<BR>
Can you explain what "and finally considering values but ignoring value symmetry, i.e. transposing 5 and 4" means? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)<BR>
:Ah, did you mean placing each (non-double) both ways, eg 5-4 or 4-5? If so, that took me nearly fives hours to twig... --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 17:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Also, there is apparently no "chaining" going on here, no need to match any adjacent tile, that could be made clearer. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Also, there is apparently no "chaining" going on here, no need to match any adjacent tile, that could be made clearer. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 17 November 2021

ignoring value symmetry

Can you explain what "and finally considering values but ignoring value symmetry, i.e. transposing 5 and 4" means? --Pete Lomax (talk) 13:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Ah, did you mean placing each (non-double) both ways, eg 5-4 or 4-5? If so, that took me nearly fives hours to twig... --Pete Lomax (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Also, there is apparently no "chaining" going on here, no need to match any adjacent tile, that could be made clearer. --Pete Lomax (talk) 15:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)