Talk:Dominoes: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Dominoes (view source)

Revision as of 14:58, 18 November 2021

653 bytes added , 2 years ago

→‎ignoring value symmetry

Nigel Galloway

2,171

edits

Revision as of 17:54, 17 November 2021 (view source) Petelomax (talk \| contribs) (→‎ignoring value symmetry) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 14:58, 18 November 2021 (view source) Nigel Galloway (talk \| contribs) (→‎ignoring value symmetry)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: ==ignoring value symmetry== Can you explain what "and finally considering values but ignoring value symmetry, i.e. transposing 5 and 4" means? --[[User:Petelomax\|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax\|talk]]) 13:01, 17 November 2021 (UTC)<BR> :Ah, did you mean placing each (non-double) both ways, eg 5-4 or 4-5? If so, that took me nearly ~~fives~~five hours to twig... --[[User:Petelomax\|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax\|talk]]) 17:53, 17 November 2021 (UTC) :Considering the example of your own construction I meant that 1 4 2 2 0 1+5 0 + + + + + + 6 1 2 3 4 6+4 3 2 6 0 2 3+5 5 6 + + + + + + 6 3 5 0 5 1 6 0 + + 4 2 1 0 4 0 6+6 + + + + 4 4 2 0 5 3 1 3 + + + + 1+1 5+2 5 3 3 4 :where I have replaced all 1's by 6 and all 6's by 1 in the input is essentially the same with the same set of solutions. :Changing the input by swapping 1 and 6 in the first column: 14220650 66234143 21023551 13505610 42604011 44205363 66525334 :will result in a different solution.--[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 14:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Also, there is apparently no "chaining" going on here, no need to match any adjacent tile, that could be made clearer. --[[User:Petelomax\|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax\|talk]]) 15:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)