Talk:Cuban primes: Difference between revisions
m
phooey
m (→Why so large?: changed a "tense" word.) |
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (phooey) |
||
Line 7:
:: That specific number was the only cuban prime of any substance that could be verified as being correct. If anyone had a reputable web page that has a reference to a smaller number, I would've used that instead. So Thundergnat's theory falls flat. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 14:10, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
::: Darn! :-) --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 14:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||