Talk:Compiler/syntax analyzer: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
m ((forgot signature))
mNo edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
If I read it correctly, the C reference implementation does treat unary operators as highest precedence.
If I read it correctly, the C reference implementation does treat unary operators as highest precedence.
--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 08:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 08:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

You are correct. Thanks for catching this! I have modified the grammar. --[[User:Ed Davis|Ed Davis]] ([[User talk:Ed Davis|talk]]) 11:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:04, 23 October 2016

Unary operator precedence

In the grmmmar, the definition of primary is:

    primary             =   Identifier
                          | Integer
                          | '(' expr ')'
                          | ('+' | '-' | '!') expr
                          ;

which makes the unary operators the lowest precedence? Should that be:

    primary             =   Identifier
                          | Integer
                          | '(' expr ')'
                          | ('+' | '-' | '!') primary
                          ;

which would be more usual? If I read it correctly, the C reference implementation does treat unary operators as highest precedence. --Tigerofdarkness (talk) 08:46, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

You are correct. Thanks for catching this! I have modified the grammar. --Ed Davis (talk) 11:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)