Anonymous user
Talk:Classes: Difference between revisions
→The point of the C code?: new section
(→Classes as Objects: new section) |
(→The point of the C code?: new section) |
||
Line 9:
Some object systems have classes as being entities in the object system: there's a class of classes. Others do not. Is this worth mentioning here (possibly with a link to a task to show what's going on)? (Also, some of the object systems that have a class of classes also allow subclassing of that class...) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 09:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
== The point of the C code? ==
Isn't the C sample here a bit useless? After all this work, one ends up with a blob of data, a few functions intended to operator on said data, a lot of ugly long identifiers but no way to do inheritance or polymorphism, because nothing is provided for method dispatching base on type or object. Where's the OO in this? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 22:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
| |||