Talk:Circles of given radius through two points: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→More special cases: Inconsistencies are the bane of good programming) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→XPL0: new section) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::::And based on that, I've removed the marking of the Tcl version as incorrect. Inconsistencies in the spec mean that I can do that. (Anyone arguing that there always has to be two circles returned is just confusing restrictions caused by the way ''their'' language wants to do things; the natural thing in Tcl is just to return a list of all the circles that there are.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 13:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC) |
::::And based on that, I've removed the marking of the Tcl version as incorrect. Inconsistencies in the spec mean that I can do that. (Anyone arguing that there always has to be two circles returned is just confusing restrictions caused by the way ''their'' language wants to do things; the natural thing in Tcl is just to return a list of all the circles that there are.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 13:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::And dealing with nearly "normal" specifications are an important part of programming ;-)<br> --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
:::And dealing with nearly "normal" specifications are an important part of programming ;-)<br> --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
== XPL0 == |
|||
REXX referred to XPL0 |
|||
This secion was removed at some point in time |
|||
Unfortuately the Histore does not show when and by whom. |
|||
I restored now the old section --Walter Pachl 08:35, 15 October 2017 (UTC) |
|||