Talk:Chess player: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Task size) |
(Chess engine) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This draft task, while fairly well defined, feels daunting. Is it possible to at least split it into pieces (e.g., framework to allow two players to play chess, and a robot implementation of a player)? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC) |
This draft task, while fairly well defined, feels daunting. Is it possible to at least split it into pieces (e.g., framework to allow two players to play chess, and a robot implementation of a player)? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
: My intention for this task was only the second part. A special chess front end is not necessary, just the input and output of moves (it is just an add-on that the PicoLisp solution outputs a simple ASCII board display). --[[User:Abu|Abu]] 12:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
I didn't know that single-word names should be avoided. Then perhaps a better name would have been "Chess engine"? This is how it seems to be usually called. --[[User:Abu|Abu]] 12:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:20, 24 April 2012
Task size
This draft task, while fairly well defined, feels daunting. Is it possible to at least split it into pieces (e.g., framework to allow two players to play chess, and a robot implementation of a player)? –Donal Fellows 10:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- My intention for this task was only the second part. A special chess front end is not necessary, just the input and output of moves (it is just an add-on that the PicoLisp solution outputs a simple ASCII board display). --Abu 12:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
I didn't know that single-word names should be avoided. Then perhaps a better name would have been "Chess engine"? This is how it seems to be usually called. --Abu 12:20, 24 April 2012 (UTC)