Talk:Check Machin-like formulas: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 22:23, 8 November 2012

Aesthetics

The original equations without the math formatting have a lot going for them. What do you think? --Paddy3118 21:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

 The text format can be used for data input (as in the Python example) and the formatted fractions are a bit crowded (small line spacing).
 There are some odd text sizes now, the last identity [tan(-a)=-tan(a)] is in a smaller font with Firefox 16.0.2, anyone else see this? 
 If we can't improve the current layout I woulod prefer the original format. TobyK 22:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

OCaml: Very long line

Could the OCaml be changed to indicate equality with one as a short true/false indicator rather than printing out the very long line? Thanks. --Paddy3118 21:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

 OK, I have chnnged the Ocaml program so the output is shorter TobyK 22:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Aesthetics==
 The original equations without the math formatting have a lot going for them. What do you think? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:08, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
-  The text format can be used for data input (as in the Python example) and the formatted fractions are a bit crowded (small line spacing). There are some odd text sizes now, the last identity [tan(-a)=-tan(a)] is in a smaller font with Firefox 16.0.2, anyone else see this? If we can't improve the current layout I woulod prefer the original format. [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 22:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
+  The text format can be used for data input (as in the Python example) and the formatted fractions are a bit crowded (small line spacing).
+  There are some odd text sizes now, the last identity [tan(-a)=-tan(a)] is in a smaller font with Firefox 16.0.2, anyone else see this?
+  If we can't improve the current layout I woulod prefer the original format. [[User:TobyK|TobyK]] 22:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
 ==OCaml: Very long line==