Talk:Carmichael 3 strong pseudoprimes: Difference between revisions
Talk:Carmichael 3 strong pseudoprimes (view source)
Revision as of 10:44, 25 September 2016
, 7 years ago→Formula in Fortran contribution invisible to most browsers
(A formula in the Fortran contribution is invisible at the moment - check the <math> tag and test in Chrome, Safari or IE/Edge) |
|||
Line 3:
In the Fortran contribution, there is a formula which is at present invisible to all but a minority type of browser. The majority browser type, which displays a graphic file for <math> tag formula rather than generating text from locally installed fonts and local MathML processing, shows only a white space after the phrase: '''as in the expression for the n'th Fibonacci number:'''.
To see and test any fixes the problem, view the page in a mainstream browser like Chrome, Safari, or IE/Edge (rather than in one of the minority browsers like Firefox, which, when requisite fonts are installed, uses local MathML processing. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 17:32, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
:Huh? Firefox is a "minority" class browser? But yes, I have just dabbled with IE8 and indeed the formula is not rendered, instead there appears a box with a big red cross in it. Much the same happens when IE8 is pointed at wikipedia's Fibonacci_number article where their formulae do not appear either. The W. formula is slightly different and possibly I rearranged it a little - I don't quite recall where I found it, but I never expected this inability! Similar formula preparation language has been available in OpenOffice's text editor for some years now, for example, and I though it relatively standard. However, via mathproofs.blogspot.com I've found an image of the formula, but I'm not familiar with inserting such into Rosettacode... I could of course rewrite the formula in Fortran source style, but that lacks the far more pleasing layout and glyphs of the mathematical formula. [[User:Dinosaur|Dinosaur]] ([[User talk:Dinosaur|talk]]) 10:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
==clarification of Carmichael 3 strong pseudomprimes==
| |||