Revision as of 10:12, 9 July 2011 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎A mess?: Nice and ...) ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:20, 9 July 2011 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎A mess?: Zero.) Newer edit →
Line 53: :::Nice and fuzzy? No, nice and precise! I'm sure that there may well be other ways to get to precise, but being nice makes the journey more enjoyable. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 10:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC) == Natural numbers == :: The task description now reads "natural numbers". Do we all agree that natural numbers are integers greater than or equal to zero? Or is this another source of confusion? [[User:Markhobley\|Markhobley]] 09:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC) :Any question about zero from the wp link description shouldn't really matter for the purposes of this task. What does matter are that it ''doesn't'' include negative numbers with absolute value greater than zero. I'm sure someone could pick holes in this if they tried, but I think the clarification in the linked text should be OK for the purposes of the task. (But then I did add the link). --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 10:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Binary digits: Difference between revisions

Talk:Binary digits (view source)