Talk:Arithmetic/Complex: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Ada fixed)
(Error in C example)
Line 1: Line 1:
Ada and C++ both still need negation. I forgot to put it in the Java example before but I added I it later. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 10:13, 9 March 2008 (MDT)
Ada and C++ both still need negation. I forgot to put it in the Java example before but I added I it later. Sorry for the confusion. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 10:13, 9 March 2008 (MDT)
:The Ada entry has been amended to include negation. --[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 14:40, 9 March 2008 (MDT)
:The Ada entry has been amended to include negation. --[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 14:40, 9 March 2008 (MDT)
I believe the C example is incorrect. The current written example relies upon operator overloading which is not supported by C99.--[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 09:10, 11 March 2008 (MDT)

Revision as of 15:10, 11 March 2008

Ada and C++ both still need negation. I forgot to put it in the Java example before but I added I it later. Sorry for the confusion. --Mwn3d 10:13, 9 March 2008 (MDT)

The Ada entry has been amended to include negation. --Waldorf 14:40, 9 March 2008 (MDT)

I believe the C example is incorrect. The current written example relies upon operator overloading which is not supported by C99.--Waldorf 09:10, 11 March 2008 (MDT)