Jump to content

Talk:Numbers with prime digits whose sum is 13: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6:
== These are NOT unlucky numbers ==
Unlucky number have a long established definition and this is not it. (See [[oeis:A050505|OEIS A050505]].) These are "Integers in base 10 whose digits are all prime and sum to 13". or perhaps "Unlucky digit sums" My question is: what is the significance of the digits being prime? What property makes these numbers "unlucky"? If it is the summing to 13 why wouldn't 168 be "unlucky"? --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 10:20, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 
== Changes in code ==
I have changed the code and now is the largest Unlucky Number is 322,222
What do you suggest for new task name?
2,468

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.