Talk:Ternary logic: Difference between revisions
→Any need for this task to remain draft?: new section
(→if a then b: Also ⇔, ≡ and ↔ are "equivalent", '''and''' equivalent to each other and to '''if and only if''' and '''iff'''.) |
(→Any need for this task to remain draft?: new section) |
||
Line 37:
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 04:04, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
== Any need for this task to remain draft? ==
By example count, diversity and clarity, it seems like it's reasonably well-understood. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 19:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
| |||